Scarlatti Anyone?

July 23, 2022

Domenico Scarlatti 1685-1757

Sonata in D Major, Longo # 164

Here's a piano recording I made in 2006 of a Scarlatti Sonata using my Mason & Hamlin piano. It was recorded in a Church that had very little carpeting but lots of stone, so the acoustics are wonderfully reverberant. This piece was popularized in the “Switched On Bach” recordings back in the 60s. Also, a favorite of one of my favorite pianists, Vladimir Horowitz. So I’ve loved this piece for a long time. Scarlatti spent most of his life in service to Portuguese and Spanish Royal families, and so there are echoes of the pomp and flourishes he heard there. Very Regal! Please enjoy.

Elements Online Magazine

January 30, 2022

I was delighted to be included in the December "Celebrating the Print" issue in the online magazine Elements. But my "delight" meter has spiked, since I am the "featured" photographer in the February issue! The editors developed a series of questions based on various things that I've written over the years. It's quite comprehensive, and includes many of my favorite photos plus a few that have never seen the light of day. In the interview, one of the subjects concerns editing one's work. I find this very difficult. Perhaps because I feel most of my images should never see the light of day! But I also discuss how this is probably true of most photographers. (I also discuss the case of Ansel Adams in this regard).

Elements Magazine can be found here.
As you probably know, most photographic magazines are 60-70%
advertisements! Elements has none, and contains 100+ pages of content.

Clair de Lune

January 29, 2022

Clair de Lune

Claire de Lune

This is a recording I did in 2006 on my Mason & Hamlin piano. It is a quiet and wonderful piece. I first heard it on an album entitled "Mysteries of the Night" released in the 60s. Clair de Lune here was arranged for guitar. But I liked it so much that it's one of the few vinyl records that I have I kept all these years. I remember one of my earlier piano teachers called it "Clear the Saloon." Of course, once I mention that, it will be hard for you to forget. But, pay no attention to me!

Elements Magazine

November 24, 2021

Elements Magazine Cover

I'm honored that I will be one of the photographers in this special issue of Elements Online Magazine. It's called "CELEBRATION OF THE PRINT." Each photographer has selected three images to show, and answered various questions about print making. Some of the other photographers included are Ansel Adams, John Sexton, Joseph Holmes, Michael Kenna, and many others.

ELEMENTS is a monthly online publication that focuses (pun intended) on landscape photography. The publisher has created a special discount coupon for readers of this blog. Use the code CHARLES10 to receive a 10% discount on an annual subscription of 12 issues. You can learn more about ELEMENTS, and subscriptions at Elements Photo Magazine. This special issue goes live on Dec. 4th.

My Show at the Center for Photographic Art

June 11, 2021

My Show at the Center for Photographic Art

In 2010, I was absolutely thrilled to be asked to have a one-man exhibition at the Center for Photographic Art. In the video, I explain the venerable history of this gallery. Since this was a huge show, I wanted to create a video of the exhibition, so I could remember it and share it with others. The gallery is exquisitely appointed, with wonderful lighting and excellent layout.

I’d like to thank Jim Kasson, a friend and a benefactor of this gallery for sponsoring the show. Also, the many people who volunteered to help hang the show—an immense undertaking!

The CPA is still going strong, even during the last few trying years. They are a wonderful resource for photographers, and others who just appreciate the arts. Their website is found at a URL that is the envy of many! So simple, and to the point: www.photography.org.

Thanks for viewing my video and please consider supporting the Center.

CPA

June 7, 2021

Lovelinesss

(Don't worry—the sound doesn't start until about 9 seconds in)

Brent Heisinger is a superb musician that I met when I was a music major at San Jose State many moons ago. His specialty is composition and has an impressive catalog of compositions for various ensembles.

I often attended concerts by the San Jose Chamber Orchestra, who have performed many of Heisinger’s pieces. In 2012, he wrote a short piano piece and enlisted one of the piano faculty at San Jose State University, Gwen Mok to play and record it. He wanted to create a video with some images of the natural scene. Although I didn’t routinely create videos, I knew enough to do some rudimentary editing.

Brent had definite ideas about what it should look like, and we met several times to work on it. One of his ideas involved blending some closeups of Dr. Mok’s hands into the video, and we met at Mok’s studio to tape that.

This piece has many wonderful mood changes, which Dr. Mok performed to perfection. I am very happy with the finished result.

Brent dedicated this piece to his wife Barbara.

Ansel Adams' Piano

July 26, 2020

Mozart’s Come Scoglio, from Cosi fan tutte, with Rebecca Basilio, soprano

As a music major in College majoring in piano, one gets called on to do lots of accompanying. This means playing the piano part for various instrumentalists, singers, and others. Later, at Eastman, I played with a string quartet, and other ensembles. But, one of the best singers I ever accompanied was Rebecca Basilio.

Now, a diversion to explain what follows....

Attending the Ansel Adams Yosemite workshop in 1977, I got to know Ansel a tiny bit. I’m a little shy, but through the help of one of the people also attending this workshop (Ron Bentley, from Australia), I got to know Ansel much better. Ron was already a friend of Ansel’s. When Ron later visited this country, he usually also went to Carmel to see Ansel, and he started inviting me for such visits. Ansel learned that I was also a pianist, and for his Birthday in 1984, his staff asked the famous Russian pianist, Vladimir Ashkenazy to play for the party (and he did previously in 1982). There were only about 75 seats for this, so seating was at a premium. Amazingly, I was invited! I later learned that his staff was very upset about this, as there were many more important people that got bumped! But, I think Ansel figured I was a pianist, and so I should come and hear this incredible pianist.

It was an amazing experience, in many ways. When I arrived (April 22, 1984), they announced that Ansel was actually in the hospital. But Ansel wanted the party to continue, he was feeling much better, and Ashkenazy did perform. I was on cloud nine! But, when I woke up the next morning, the news shows announced that Ansel had died late the previous night. What a terrible shock!

On reflection, I think that was just like Ansel. He thought of all of us first, and held on to not spoil the party.

About a year later, I rather audaciously offered Virginia, his widow, to do a piano recital for her. Amazingly—she accepted, and said that this would be the first social event she had hosted since Ansel died. It was thrilling to play on this incredible Mason & Hamlin piano. Mason & Hamlin is not a big name now, but back when Ansel was planning on devoting his life to the piano, his family bought one in 1925—because it was considered one of the very best. That is the piano I got to play. Unfortunately, I did not record this recital. But, I did get a photo!

Back to the originally scheduled post....

After this, I told Virginia that I knew an incredible soprano, and that we could do a Mother’s Day recital for her (Virginia was a singer in her youth). And what you’ll hear is one of the pieces from that recital.

Fortunately, I did record this recital, but there are no photos, of course! I set the recorder back in Ansel’s office, and put the mics in what turned out to be a decent position. With a soprano like Rebecca, she can produce a big sound, and the balance with the piano can be a problem. But, this recording is not too bad sound-wise. And you get to hear Ansel’s beloved Mason & Hamlin.

In Search of Your Best Images

July 8, 2020

Ansel Adams’ Best

It is estimated that Ansel Adams produced 40-50,000 negatives during his lifetime—an amazing amount of work. But, how many of these did Ansel print? And how many of those ended up as what he called his “Mona Lisas”?

When I took my first Ansel Adams workshop in 1977, I was convinced that anything that Ansel photographed would be magical—his powers were so refined by decades of experience that his every exposure was a masterpiece. I gradually learned that was not the case! In fact, of those 50,000 negatives, I’ve heard estimates that 400-500 different images have been published. That’s 1 percent. Ansel himself said that making twelve meaningful photographs a year is good production.

Don Worth, one of Ansel’s first assistants, told me that one of his jobs was to make some new proofs of all of Ansel’s 8x10 negatives of Yosemite. He said that he was amazed…that so many of them were just “record” shots. In other words, images that are mostly devoid of emotional content.

I feel better already—because that describes most of my images! If this is the case, how do we mere mortals go about figuring out which of our images go beyond being mere “record” shots? I think it is especially difficult with landscape work.

Aspen in Fog, Boulder Mountain, Utah 2003

What Is Best?

First, I think we need to ask what makes an image good or even great. (Just google “What is Art” and get back to me…) What I go by is—does the image elicit some positive emotional response? Some images just make us go “oohhh." Some just resonate with people.

Because, why would a prudent and sane person go into a gallery and walk out having plopped down 500 hard-earned dollars for a photograph? It’s because they had a strong reaction to the image. It got to them on some level. It created an emotional response. So, how can we determine which of our images create such a response?

Finding Your Best

First, the photographer who makes the image is not necessarily a good judge. Just because you had to hike 20 miles to get to a location does not make it a better image than one found right along the road. The viewer of the photograph does not know any of that. The viewer only sees what is presented in the image. I remember Don Worth saying that, before selecting which images to print, he’d like to even forget taking them. Then you can be objective!

I find that having other people review my images is a great help. But, we can’t ask them to look at 10,000 of our images and then select their favorites. The photographer will have to do a first or second edit to narrow down the choices to a workable amount. And software like Lightroom makes this much easier. I have learned to trust my initial edits to some degree. But I always go back and “tweak” every image a little, so every image looks presentable. And then go through them all again to search for “sleepers." I still go back every once in a while to review older images. I’ve heard it said that our conscious mind lags behind the subconscious. So some images we make we don’t quite understand yet—but will in the future. I’ve found a few good sleepers over the years…

When friends visit, I usually ask them to give me feedback on some images. But, I don’t ask them which is the best. I ask which is their favorite. I want to know which ones “get” to them. In workshops, after a print critique, I’ll tell the group, “Mary has graciously agreed to give everyone two prints of their choice!” Mary hasn’t really agreed to this—but I want the students to think about which of Mary’s prints mean something to them. Which of these prints would they like to have on their walls at home? That’s a very different question than just asking which is the best. This question gets people to think about how they respond to these images on a personal level.

Trees in Fog, Wawona Road, Yosemite 1982

Does Popularity Equal Best?

Years ago, a friend and I agreed to trade prints. He asked, “which are your bestsellers?” I initially thought this was not a good way to judge the merit of one’s images. But now, I think he might be on to something. Above is the print that has sold the most for me, “Trees in Fog, Wawona Road, Yosemite." When I recently traded images with two photographers I really respect, I was very surprised when they both choose this image.

Another friend who is a very fine photographer had a feature on his website where people could choose their favorite images. When he did an analysis of which got the most votes, he was very disappointed. He said any image with a snowy mountain peak was at the top of the list! But I wonder if web-surfers are a different demographic than the people who feel strongly enough to actually pay a lot of money for a print? I would hope so. Either that, or “Trees in Fog” has pleasing colors that match lots of sofas!

Piano Recording

June 7, 2020

Rachmaninoff Etude-Tableau no. 2, Op. 33

Since my wonderful Web Designer made it possible, I have uploaded an mp3 file that I recorded in 2012. I can’t believe I actually played this, because it involves a very awkward left hand part. Sergei Rachmaninoff had very large hands, and took advantage of that fact often. I think this is one case where it was easy for him, but very awkward for mere mortals like me.

Anyway, I also had the advantage of being able to do multiple takes, and if I didn’t play something right the first time, I could try it again. Then combining them until I was happy.

This is Rachmaninoff’s Etude-Tableau No. 2 from the Op. 33 set. One of my favorite pieces.

If you don’t like this, then blame my web designer! Just kidding— I take full responsibility!

About Printing, and Viewing your Prints

May 26, 2020

Morning Mist, Caddo Lake ©2014 Charles Cramer

Take Your Time

If you’ve done darkroom printing in either B&W or color, you know it’s not a quick process. Most of the darkroom processes I used required a drying time for the prints, which meant big delays until you finally got to critically evaluate the result. And if you were not happy with the first result (which was typical), you carefully considered how you could make the print look better. When I did the Dye Transfer color process, I would consider over a period of several days what I would do to make a better print. When I took my time, the 2nd print I made was usually an improvement.

Nowadays, with inkjet printers, you can get a finished print in minutes! How exciting— except when I quickly make that second print, I often make it worse! I realized that I needed to slow down, to carefully consider the changes I was going to make.

When I now print my work, or when I advise people in my workshops, I recommend working on at least 2 or three images at a time. This will slow you down. Because here’s what I usually experience: After working up an image on the monitor, and then making the first proof print, I am usually a little disappointed in the result. I think this is because images usually look better on the monitor! The monitor has a bigger dynamic range than a print—it glows. And it’s hard to compete with that. But, before deciding how that first print could be improved, I move on to another image. I work that up and make a print of it. And again, I am a little disappointed. But, when I then look at that first print, I always think, “well, that’s not so bad!” I can now see that first print with fresh eyes, and am in a better position to consider how to improve it.

So slow down and take time in considering how you can make a print look better. Work with more than one image at a time.

My Print Viewing Area, Now with LEDs

A Dedicated Place to View Prints

Having a dedicated area where you can display prints is incredibly valuable. Using a rail or shelf illuminated by track lighting is the perfect way to display and evaluate your prints. I prefer a long rail, as seeing many prints together is incredibly helpful, especially with ferreting out any color balance problems. A permanent rail like this will be one of the best investments you can make to improve your photography! As I discussed above, figuring out how to improve a print should take some time, and having a place where you can see that proof print over a period of time is vital. Often, just passing by the print during the day will get your unconscious working on it—and then sometimes you'll say "Aha! Now I know how to make it better..."

The intensity of this light is also critical. If it’s too bright, then your prints will look too dark under typical gallery conditions. If you have a spotmeter (I've got one from my film days), meter a piece of white matboard (I use Rising white). An excellent result would be a reading of around 10 to 11 EV (at 100 ISO). One can also use a camera to take such a reading. You will need to fill the frame with the white matboard, making sure you’re not casting any shadows! If your ISO is set to 100, and your aperture to f8, then the shutter speed should read around 10th to 15th of a second.

The image above shows a part of my print shelf. Also notice that I put the prints in white mats (which I've made to be reusable), as this will change your perception of the print slightly! This will make the prints look slightly darker. It's the most perceptually accurate way.

LEDs for viewing prints

As of late 2014, I have switched out my tungsten/halogen bulbs in favor of LEDs made by Soraa. Soraa has a technology that creates excellent color, with a color rendering index of 95. I recommend Soraa bulb 00943. The specs for this are: Vivid Par30L, 2700K, 7.5 Watts, CRI 95, 36 degree beam spread, 410 Lumens. I recommend the 2700 degree Kelvin color temperature, which closely matches Tungsten-halogen bulbs. For a slightly brighter bulb (60 watt halogen equivalent), you would want model 00963, which is 9 watts. I find that spacing the fixtures about 18 inches apart will give nicely even light.

I recommend using 2700 Kelvin for the color temperature, because that is how your print will be seen 98% of the time. (OK, I made that up :-) ). I know of no gallery that uses the 5000K, or 4700 bulbs—they are much too blue! With LEDs you can choose amongst various color temperatures, like 3000K, or 3400K. But I hear most LEDs sold are 2700K, because people want the light that they're used to with tungsten or tungsten/halogen bulbs. Which is 2700K. One of the great things about LEDs is you can dim them, and not change the color temperature!

My setup at home uses MR-16 bulbs, which are made for light fixtures that have built-in transformers that convert the 120 track voltage to 12 volts. You need a fixture that has a transformer that can work with the low wattage the LEDs use. I'm using Halo track, with a WAC Lighting HHT-160-WT H Series Low Voltage Track Head, 50W. Buy these fixtures without bulbs (if possible), because you're going to use Soraa bulbs. It's helpful to consult a l local business that specializes in track lighting.

Again, that's Soraa 777056 SM16-07-36D-927-03 Vivid MR16 GU5.3 7.5W 2700K 36 Degree LED Light Bulb. and the track is 30 inches from the wall. The 9 watt bulbs I find too bright for this situation, with an 8 foot ceiling. I like to be able to put various size prints without worrying about hot spots. This is why I put a fixture every 18 inchesand chose the 36 degree floods, and used 7.5 watts. A great test is to line up white mount board and adjust the lights so it's fairly even across.

These bulbs may be, amazingly, hard to get in California, because they don't exactly fit some recent regulations. But these are LEDs! I was able to get some recently through Amazon.